Schizophrenia and monothematic delusions.

نویسندگان

  • Max Coltheart
  • Robyn Langdon
  • Ryan McKay
چکیده

Numerous delusions have been studied which are highly specific and which can present in isolation in people whose beliefs are otherwise entirely unremarkable - "monothematic delusions" such as Capgras or Cotard delusions. We review such delusions and summarize our 2-factor theory of delusional belief which seeks to explain what causes these delusional beliefs to arise initially and what prevents them being rejected after they have arisen. Although these delusions can occur in the absence of other symptoms, they can also occur in the context of schizophrenia, when they are likely to be accompanied by other delusions and hallucinations. We propose that the 2-factor account of particular delusions like Capgras and Cotard still applies even when these delusions occur in the context of schizophrenia rather than occurring in isolation.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

1 Delusional Belief

Delusional beliefs are seen in association with a number of neuropathological conditions, including schizophrenia, dementia and traumatic brain injury, A key distinction exists between polythematic delusion (here the patient exhibits delusional beliefs about a variety of topics that are unrelated to each other) and monothematic delusion (here the patient exhibits just a single delusional belief...

متن کامل

Nature And Types of Delusion In Schizophrenia And Mania – Is There A Difference ?

Background: Delusions have been regarded as a core sign of psychosis and can be found in various psychiatric illnesses including Schizophrenia and Mania and considerable overlap between the types of delusion have been observed in both Schizophrenia and Mania Aims: This study therefore aims at examining and comparing the nature and types of delusion in schizophrenia and mania Methods: a total of...

متن کامل

Bottom-Up or Top- Down? Campbell’s Rationalist Account of Monothematic Delusions

A popular approach to monothematic delusions in the recent literature has been to argue that monothematic delusions involve broadly rational responses to highly unusual experiences. Campbell (2001) calls this the empiricist approach to monothematic delusions, and argues that it cannot account for the links between meaning and rationality. In place of empiricism, Campbell offers a rationalist ac...

متن کامل

A Logical Defence of Maher's Model of Polythematic Delusions

We proceed to describe a model for the formation and maintenance of polythematic delusions encountered in schizophrenia, which is in adequacy with Brendan Maher's account of delusions. Polythematic delusions are considered here as the conclusions of arguments triggered by apophenia that include some very common errors of reasoning such as post hoc fallacy and confirmation bias. We describe firs...

متن کامل

Can delusions be understood linguistically?

Delusions are widely believed to reflect disturbed cognitive function, but the nature of this remains elusive. The "un-Cartesian" cognitive-linguistic hypothesis maintains (a) that there is no thought separate from language, that is, there is no distinct mental space removed from language where "thinking" takes place; and (b) that a somewhat broadened concept of grammar is responsible for besto...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Schizophrenia bulletin

دوره 33 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007